% & (1975). (2002) (2004) (2004). (2011) (2011). (2011, (2012) (2012, (2019) (Bromley (Norris, (Stanford (as (down ). 1-4). 11% 16% 16). 1918, 1974 1986 1986-2003 1986. 1990’s 2 20 2001 2003 2003, 2003. 2004). 2011 2011). 2011, 2012, 30 34% 4 4, 42% 5, : According Action Additionally, Also, American Annual April Are As Association Association, Attitudes Authoritarian B. Behavior Brandt Britain Britain’s British Bromley Bromley, But C., CREST. Cambridge Case China, China. China: Citizens Corruption Crisis Critical Crozier, Curtice Curtice, D., Deficit: Democracy. Democracy? Democratic Despite Diverse Eastern Egypt, Europe European Even Facing February Finest For Furthermore, G. Government Harmel Harmel, Hewitt Hewitt, Hour However, Huntington Huntington, Importantly, In Iraq Is It J. J., Kingdom Kingdom, Libya London. London: M., Meeting Member Miliband, Moreover, N. NYU New Norris Norris, Notes]. October One P. Paper Parliament Persons Political Press. R., Rather Reference Regimes: Retrieved Revisited. S., Sachs, Satisfaction Science Seattle. September Seyd Seyd, Social Standford States”. Study Survey Syria, The Therefore, These This Thus, Trust Undoubtedly, Union's United University University, University. Washington Watanuki, Watanuki,1975, What While Willy Woods Woods, Y. Yeh Yeh, York: [Lecture [United [Video [had] a abandoned abandonment ability absenteeism abstention abusing academics accepted according account account, accuracy acknowledged active actively actors advent affairs affairs”. affecting affirmative. after al al, alienation all alluded almost also an and antithetical any apparatuses apparent are argued argument arguments arms/branches as aspect assertion, at attitudes authoritarian authoritarianism, autocratic autonomy avenues. away bases bay be beacon become been before before, begs behaviour believed below between beyond biased. both branches break brink burning but by called can cannot captured case cause central certainly challenges change changes characterized choosing circumstances cited citing citizenry citizenry. citizens citizens’ citizen’s city civic civil clear climate cognizant collapse complete conclusion conclusive conclusively confidence confined connotes contacted contended context contradict contradictions contrasts core corrosive corruption countries country, course crisis crisis, crisis. critics cultural cure dangles data day. deal decade decades decided declared decline declining decreased deepened deepened. deepening definitively delve democracies democracies. democracy democracy, democracy. democracy; democratic democratic. democratization demonstrate despite deteriorated deterioration determine developments dictatorship” different disengaged disengagement disillusioned dissatisfaction distinctive does down drop during each early edge effect effects elapsed elected election elections elections, elections. elections” electoral element embrace empirically endure enduring engaged engagement engaging engineless enticed entire equality erosion especially essence, essential essentially estimated et even eventually evidenced example example, exhibit experiencing explanation explanations extends external extreme face faced facing fact factors fair faith file]. finding fizzled flawed fluctuate fluctuation fluctuations for form forms franchise”. fraught free freedom.” from fundamentally further general general. given globally governance governance. government government. governmental governments gradual grappling great gross groups had has hasty have higher highest highly hold how however however, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-15754521 http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/archivos_pdf/crisis_of_democracy.pdf http://www.stanford.edu/~ldiamond/iraq/WhaIsDemocracy012004.htm http://www.ucl.ac.uk/spp/publications/unit-publications/112.pdf https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9czHoFQY34 human idea ideals if ignored impending in includes including increase increased increasing increasingly indeed indicate indicates indicators influence ingredients inherent instead interest interested internal into irrespective is is, it it, it. its itself itself. keep key know lack landscape last law law. leader. led left legitimizes level levels life lips local long looming low lowest ludicrous made majority” many mass may means mechanism media merely meted methodologies minority mistrust mobbed more more)” most, much must narrowly national nature necessarily necessary need needed net no non-electoral not notion number object of often on one one. only opposite option or order oscillations other out over p.10). paper; paramount parliamentary part participate participating participation participation, participations passes. pattern, patterns peoples percent percentage period, periodic periods persons petitions pg. pg9). points political politicians politics polls. posit power precariously precondition prematurely premature”. presages prescription present. presented preservation principle principles probably problematic problematic. problems problems. process proclamation prominence proponents proportion proposing protection protest protested proven public publication purport purports purports? question question, questionable rates rather reaction reason, reasonable reasons receded receding recurrently reduce regards regime. regimes regimes’ related reliable remains renowned replacing reported represent represented researchers residual responding result revealed rich right rights riots. rocked rudderless rule ruled said same scandal scandalous scope sea seemed seems seen series sharpest shifts short should signed significant similar since sit skeptic slide, slight small so so-called society socio some something somewhat specific specifically state state. states stay still stood strikes subscribing substantial such suggests support supposition surprising surrounding system system, systematic taking talk tenants term than that the the] their them themselves there therefore these they thinkers/actors thirty this those though threats threats. three through time timeframe times to too total totalitarian towards tradition treatment trend trendless trends true trust trust, trust. trusting turn turnout turnout, uncharacteristic unconventional under unfounded uniform unique until untimely up upon upsurge use used utilized validities values variance very viable views violated violating violation voluntary voter war was way we well what when where whether which while who whole. why widely wield will with within worldwide would yardstick years years, years. ‘challenge’. ‘crisis’ “British “Democracy “Western “crisis” “experienced “instead “no “performance‐based “slide[s], “the