200 2015 9/11, A AND Additionally, Arabia, Armstrong, As BETWEEN Bibliography Blood: But By Centre, Christian Christianity Christianity, Christians Coalitional Conversely, Dangerous?’, David Dr English-speaking For Frequency Furthermore, Ghoulishness Ginges Given God God’s Hebrew History How In Indeed, Indonesia Iran— Iraq, Islam Islamic It Jeremy Jews, Karen Keith Leaders Many Moreover, Muslim Muslims Muslims, Myers Myers, National New Of One Opinion Other Pakistan, Paris Quran RELATIONSHIP RELIGION Religion Religion, Research Saudi Scriptures, Testament The These Thirty This Throughout To Ultimately, VIOLENCE Violence,’pens War,” Ward Ward, Western When Whereas Years’ [10] [13]. [14]. [5].” [7] [are] ] a about abuse academic accept acceptance acceptance. across acts add affiliation against age, agrarian agricultural all alleges almost alone already also among amongst amount an and any anyway. apparent apply” are are, arose articles as ascertain aspects assembled assume assumptions, at attacks attacks, attempt attempting attempts, attendance author authority avoiding away awhile be become been began behaviours, being belief beliefs beliefs, believe believers, believing between bias bigotry binding bliss. books both bound bringing broader but by calls came can capacity capacity, case catalyst category causes certainly challenges circumstances, citing citizens, claim cloak coalitional code combined commitment committed communism, compass conceptually concern concluded condoning conducted confessional conflict consequences. considerations contribute cooperation correlational corrupted.” corruptions could counterbalance countries course, crusades cultivate current cursory dangerous dangerous, data deal dedicated deeply definition dehumanizing denials denying depression derive destruction devastated developed”. development devoted devotional did, different differs discourage display divine do does dominated doubts drug each easily economic, effective either– eliminate emblematic embracing emphasizes encourage endorse ends endure enforce engine enough entitled environment epidemic equal equality, especially even everybody’s everyone evil evoked exacerbates example, exemplified exist explain explanation. explore extensive extent extreme extremely facets faiths false familiar fanaticism far farmers feel fewer first flames folly for foreign former found foundation frequently from fuel fusing gain general give glance goals, goat good grew group group, group. groupishness groups. hand happy” harmful harsh has have hegemony, her histories, history holy hostility hostility. how however, human identification ideologies, igniting implicitly important impossible imprudent, in including including, incredibly individual individuals individuals, inhabits instigate instigation instigator interest interestingly intergroup intervention. interweaved into intolerance intolerance. intolerant inundated involved involving irreligious is is, it it, its itself, it’s just justice, killing, land. language latter lead leaders led less lies life life, like likely limited lives logical, lower made majority making many martyrdom martyrdom, matter matter, may mentality messaged millions. minority misleading misled missionary mistakenly mob modern mongering moral more most motivated motives, movement movements multiple name.” nations nature necessary need negatively new, nexus non-Muslim non-believers. non-religiously nonbelievers nonbelievers.” nor norms, not not. notion novel of often on one ones one’s only opinions opposition or ordinary organisation other other, others, others. others.” our outgroup over overcoming own parsing particular passage past past. peace peace, peace.”[11] peculiar people people[17]. perceive period permeated perpetrated person personal person’s perspectives. point polarising political populous potential power power, powerful practices, prayer prayer, predicts prejudice, presence primary priming principles private problems. prominent, promote property-owners proposes protesting pursue puzzling, question rare, rather recent reconciliation, refer refuse related relationship religion religion, religion.” religion? religions religions, religions; religion’s religiosity, religious religiously religiousness report reports requires researchers restrictions revelations. rhetoric right risk rival sacrifice same sanctions satisfaction satisfactory say scrap secular seek seems. sense separate serves services. should significance simplistic small so social societies society society, sole something sometimes source. spiritual spiritually spread steps still stimulated strengthens strong strongly struggles studies studies, study such suggested suggests suicide support surveys synonymous talk tarnished, tasked teachings techniques tendencies, tendencies” tendency territory. terror terrorism terrorism. terrorist than that that, the their them, themselves there thereby these they things think this this, those though thought thoughts through throughout thus time. timeline, times times, to to, today today’s together tolerance too toward towards traditional traditions trusting truth truths twice two type ultimately understand understood undistinguishable universal unravel unrelated, untangled up uphold upon upper-class us use useful uses using varied vehement version very views, views,”numerous violence violence, violence. violence? violence” violent warfare warfare, warring warrior wars was wealth wealth, welcome well well-being,”[18] were were, what whatever when whereby which while who who’s why widespread will willing with with, within working world world, world. world’s worship would years, – — ‘Fields ‘Is “Christianity “a “although “attempting “belief “connections “doubting “faces “great “high “human “it “persecution “religious “social “the “very “violence