(1992). (1995). (1997). (1998). (2004). (2007). (2008). (2013). (2014, (Adler, (Adler2918, (Bozdaglioglu, (Checked, (Checkel, (Hinnebusch, (Obama, (Palam, (Risse-Kappen, (United (Vallely, (Valley, (Wendt, . 1(4), 1,400 11-23. 121-144. 131-132). 132). 14). 17(1), 19). 1995). 1997, 1998). 1998, 2). 20(1), 2004, 2007, 2008, 2013) 2014) 2014). 2017, 2019, 263-265). 263-285. 3(11), 3(3), 319 319-320). 324). 324-348. 327-328). 328). 363. 391-425. 46(2), 491-517. 50, 502). 6(1), 71-81. 75% A A. According Adler, Affairs, Affairs. Agency, Agency. Agency: Al-Assad’s An Anarchy Approach. April Argument. As Assembly Assembly. B. Barack Bibliography Bozdaglioglu, By Cambridge Central Checkel, Civil Compass, Constructing Constructivism Constructivist Deeply Democracies? Democratic Due E. Encounters European Eurpoean Factbook: February Firstly, For Formation: From General Globalisation: Ground: Hinnebusch, History Hukuk Identity In Independent Intelligence Interactive Interests Internation International Interpretation Islam It J. Journal Liberal Looking Middle Modern Nations Nations. New Obama Obama, Only Organisation, P. Palan, Peace Politics, Politics. Politika, President R. Relations Relations, Relaxing Retrieved Review Risse-Kappen, Security, Seizing Shia Social Speech. States Sunni Sunni-Shia Syria Syria. Syria: Syrian T. The Theory. These This To Trust Turn U.N Ultimately, Uluslararasi United Units Vallely, War Warlike Wendt, With World Y. York: a accepts achieved acknowledges action actions actor actors actors’ actor’s actually advanced agents agents, al-Assad all allow allowing allows an analysing analysis, and any are as assumed assumptions assumptions, authoritative based basic be because become been behavior behaviour behaviour, behavioural being beliefs best between branches built by came can cannot capabilities capabilities. central certain change. changed character characteristic civil clash clashes collective common company complex comprehending conclusion, conclusively conflict conflict. consists constitutive constitutive, constraints constructed construction constructivism constructivism, constructivist cooperation core credits criminal crisis cultural culture, cumulative current deconstructed deduced defined defined, demonstrations determinants developed developed. develops dialogue different discover discuss dispute dissatisfaction distinguishes do does domestic domestic, dominant each effect embedded established. exclusive. exemplified exist explain express favors find finest fixed for form formation formed formed. forms fortified founded freely from fuels function gangs. general getting global government group groups guide guidelines, happening has have held hold how https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/sy.html ideally identifying identities identities, identity identity, identity. impartial important in inborn including incompatible incompatible. independent individuals inhibit instating instead instilled institutions interaction interactions, interdependence. interest interests interests, international into intrinsic involved is it it: its it’s just known, law, lead leading legal lens, liberalism logical, looks make meaning meaningful meanings minority more motivate motivated multiple must natural need needs normative norms not numerous occasions of on one oneself only opinions opposing options or order other overtones own p. parties parties. parties’ parties” peace peace, peaceful perceived physical poisoning political politics. population possible power power, pp. pp.122-123). predominately preferences presence presumption presumptions profound prompt propellant protests public public, public. quo rationality realism reason, reasonable recognises recognized. redefined redefining regime regime’s relation relations religious represent representation represents require resolutions resolved resolved, respective result resulted reveals role schism secondly, sectarian sector sects sects. seen self-centered sense serves set shared shows side so so, social socially societal society’s sparked special. standards, state state, states states, state’s status stemmed stronger structure structures struggle such suppresses survival system tension terroristic. terrorists than that the their them then theorize theory therefore these they this through to towards trust two understand understanding understandings uprising uproar value ve vicious views war war. well what when where whereas which will with worked worse would xan years – ‘built’, ‘friction’. “Peace