& (1863) (In (in (the (where ----------------------- 1997 2 2009 2010 2012, 22, 27 3, A Absolutism: Andrew August Bentham Bentham. Brad Challenges Chapter College, Cons Consilient DEONTOLOGY Deontological Deontologists Deontology Despite Dontigney Driver ESSAY Eric Ethical Ethics Even Focusing For Friday, From Furthermore, Heard, History Hooker How However, Immanuel In Inductions Is It Jacques Jeff Jeremy John Journal Julia June Kant Kant’s March McMillan Mill Mill’s Moral Morality Normative November Outcomes, PhD Philosophy Pros Relativism Religious Richmound Rousseau Royal Showing Smith Stuart Suppose The Theories Theory This Through Thus Thus, To Utilitarianism What Whether While Would You [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [7]Deontological [8] a able about above absolute acceptable. acceptable.[8] account act action actions actions. affected alive) all all, all. allows all”. also always an and another anything applicable applicable. are argue as assert assign assumes assuming at attempts attributed away base based basic be because because, before beings belief believe believes beneficial benefit better beyond but by calculate can cannot capture case categorical certain certainty. cheating cheating). choice chose claims claims, clear come comparison conclude conclusion conclusions consequences considered considering considers contrary, contrast, contrasting correct could course dangerous decision decisions decisions. defined demands deontological deontologist deontologists deontology desire, destructive determined disregards do does doing doubts drawbacks, duties duties. duty, e effect, else. end end, end.’ equal ethical ethical. ethically ethically, ethics evaluate every evil evolve example fairly. features feel find first five flawed flawed: focuses follow for forces four fulfill fully fundamentally get gets go goal good great guidance guilt hand. happiest. happiness happiness. has have he helping his hold holding holds hostage hostages how however http://consilientinductions.blogspot.ca/2010/08/one-thing-begats-another.html http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/utilitarianism-history/ http://synapses.co.za/moral-absolutism-deontology-religious-morality/ http://www.ehow.com/info_8404891_pros-cons-ethical-theories.html http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mill-john-stuart/1863/utility/ch02.htm http://www.richmond-philosophy.net/rjp/back_issues/rjp1_hooker.pdf http://www.royalcollege.ca/portal/page/portal/rc/resources/bioethics/primers/moral_theory http://www.sfu.ca/~aheard/417/util.html human if immoral imperative’ imperative’, impossible in individual individual. innate insoluble. instance, instead instructs intended interests into is it it. it? just justifiable justify justifying kill killing know lead leading leave leaves leaving lending less life like lives lying made majority majority, majority. makes making maximize maximizes meaning means means.’ means; measure measured method minority moral morality morality, morally morals. more most murderer murders must necessarily need net no norms not not, object objective obligation of on one one. ones’ one’s only option options. or order other others others. our outcome outcomes own pain pains particular people people, permit permits person perspective philosophers philosophical pitfalls. place. pleasure pleasure, pleasures population positive positive? practical predict predicted principles. prisoners. proper provide provides put rank rather rational rationality. reality recognizes regardless reinforces remember required requirements respect responsible rest results. right right? righteousness rightness rights rules rules: sacrifice same save says scenario scene sense set should significant simply since situation.[4] situations six some something speak stating still strong such suffer suggesting system tell telling than that the their them themselves. themselves; theories theory there therefore these they this this, though thought. threPHILOSOPHY three thrives, times times. to too transcendent treat treated.’ treats truth truth. truths two ultimate ultimately unethical unhappiness universal universally unpredictable, used uses utilitarian utilitarianism utilitarianism. utility utility. victim. view villain villains’ virtue want wanted way we well what where which while who will will. with without work, worthy would wrong wrong. wrong.) you your yourself yourself. ‘a ‘categorical ‘consequentialist’ ‘ends ‘non-consequentialist’ ‘the ‘to “good