ACCOUNTING ATRILL & MORGAN Accounting is a subject that is relevant to business enterprises, especially operating, financial accounting, and managerial accounting information. There are many ways
ACCOUNTING ATRILL & MORGAN Accounting is a subject that is relevant to business enterprises, especially operating, financial accounting, and managerial accounting information. There are many ways
& (Accounting, 1988, 2 491,492), ACCOUNTING ATRILL Accounting Atrill Atrill, Firstly, Gareth However, MORGAN Morgan Morgan. Organizations Peter Society, There These This Through a about accountants accountants. accounting accounting, an and are art” as better both business but by career: constructors course, critical decision define definitions description different discussion dissimilar doctors engaged enterprises, enterprise”, especially essay explain famous financial five focus four gave have in information. interpretive is it knowledge makers. managerial many metaphorical my myth objectivity”, of on one only operating, opinion or p.490, professors proves reality. relevant six still subject supports that the these this three to two useful ways we who will work “Accounting
ACCOUNTING ATRILL & MORGAN
Accounting is a subject that is relevant to business enterprises, especially operating, financial accounting, and managerial accounting information. There are many ways to define the work engaged in by the accountants. However, in this accounting course, we only focus on 2 famous professors who have 2 different definitions of the accounting career: Peter Atrill and Gareth Morgan. These 2 doctors gave dissimilar knowledge about accounting but it is still useful to accountants or decision makers. This essay will explain these 2 definitions of both Morgan and Atrill, and a critical discussion that supports my opinion about the better description of the work of accountants.
Firstly, Morgan proves that accountants are constructors of reality. Through the definitions in “Accounting as a metaphorical enterprise”, “Accounting and the myth of objectivity”, and “Accounting as an interpretive art” (Accounting, Organizations and Society, 1988, p.490, 491,492),